In the world of business, there are many ways to make money. One of the most popular methods is to hire employees and then train them to perform certain tasks. In some cases, a company may want to take things a step further and hire people who have no previous experience but are still qualified enough for the position.
The problem with this scenario is that not every employee is capable able to perform well at their job or even being good at it. Some might even be completely useless and cause problems for your company in the long run. This can happen when they don’t know how things work or they make mistakes while doing their work.
To avoid these issues, companies need to ensure that all new hires are properly vetted before they’re hired. This vetting process includes both manual and automated processes so that each candidate has an equal chance of being hired by you. There are many different types of vetting processes out there depending on what type of business you’re running and what type of employee you’re looking for. One of the most famous types used nowadays is BS7858 staff vetting(a feature of workforce management software),which is an online process of recruitment by fulfilling all the industry standards.
In this article, we’ll compare both manual and automated BS7858 screening procedures with each other to find out which one is better:
| Manual Process | Automated Process | |
| Human Intervention | Manual vetting involves a manual review by an experienced recruiter who looks at each candidate’s CV and checks their references, as well as all other documentation provided during the application process. This includes any additional information that might be required by the company (such as bank statements). The recruiter will then decide whether they would like to proceed with interviewing or not. | Automated staff vetting means that there is no human intervention involved in your recruitment process. Recruiters do not have to read through hundreds of CVs and contact relevant references themselves. Instead, they can rely on an automated system that uses AI technology to make decisions based on applicant data and previous experience. |
| Speed | The manual vetting process is effective in ensuring that staff is suitable to work in the industry. It involves conducting a thorough background check on the staff and their family members. This includes checking their educational background, employment history, police records, and other relevant details which takes several days to complete. | The automated BS788 staff vetting system is less time-consuming than the manual one. It only takes around 20 minutes to run through all the required questions and collect data from the applicant’s bank account. This saves time for employers who don’t want to waste any more of their valuable time on manual vetting processes. |
| Customization | In a manual process, there is a customary hiring procedure that is fixed and rigid and can not be changed in any case. | BS7858 staff vetting supports the user-defined screening processes and accepts internal checklists & questionnaires. |
| Security | During the hiring process, HR has to come up with a lot of personal information about the job applicants. As all the data is paper-based, there are many chances that confidential data can be misused in some ways. | Automation ensures greater security. As everything involved in the recruiting process is on the cloud and password protected, there are fewer or no chances of loss or breach of data. |
| Integration | Flexibility and adaptability cannot be achieved by manual hiring. | Automated processes can be seamlessly integrated with other systems and devices, allowing for more efficient use of resources and greater productivity. This means that the quality of employee vetting is not restricted by the number of people available to perform their duties. |
| Accuracy | Manual vetting is prone to human error, so any errors made will result in higher overall staff costs. | Automated staff vetting has been designed specifically for businesses, so it uses advanced algorithms that eliminate human error from the equation. |
| Expenses | Manual hiring requires more money and effort to perform, which can be costly in terms of money and resources. | Automated staff vetting saves resources because there is no need for human interaction with the company’s HR department. This can save a company hundreds or even thousands of hours per year, which they can use to focus on other business activities. |
| Scalability | The data stored on the system might create a problem if the loads get bigger. For example, a spreadsheet file might get slower and more difficult to load as you insert more information. | Automated staff vetting is designed to assist a large number of stakeholders by serving multiple users hence managing thousands of entries at a time. |
| Communication | Outdated procedures are used in manual recruiting like calls and emails which are more time-consuming. Moreover, there is always a doubt whether the applicant has received the notification or not hence causing delays in approvals. | As an automated system offers strong communication, chances of delays in approvals are very rare. Additionally, with the help of automated software solutions, every conversation is stored on the cloud so there is a valid record for each statement. |
| Productivity | The productivity level of the HR team goes down due to the long and tiring procedures involved in manual hiring. | Automated staff vetting boosts productivity as it saves a lot of time, resources, and energy which can be utilized in some other useful tasks. |
Conclusion
Hence, the most common way to vet a candidate for a job is to use a manual process. This involves the interviewer conducting a conversation with the candidate and asking questions about their background, skills, experience, and professional goals.
This method of vetting can be time-consuming and inefficient, as it requires more time on the part of an interviewer than simply running a background check. It also requires that you have enough experience in your field to be able to assess whether or not someone will fit into your organization.
In contrast, automated systems are designed to run themselves without human intervention. They can quickly scan thousands of profiles in minutes instead of months or years, saving you time and money by eliminating human error. The debate over whether to use manual VS automated BS788 staff vetting is still raging.
The answer to this question depends on your circumstances, your requirements, and the type of job you are looking for. But with the advent of technology, every process needs to be computerized, so the majority of businesses use automatic solutions for screening.
